Featured insights.
Expert insight from colleagues and friends who are dedicated to changing our food systems
-
CoP 29: more about procedure than progress?
As the UN climate summit gets underway today, it is also the anniversary of the 1918 Armistice which ended the First World War. This time, however, we are facing an existential war with ourselves.
2024 is the hottest year on record and the first year above the 1.5C global warming threshold. Given that countries’ Nationally Determine Contributions (NDCs) are nowhere near the ambitions required to maintain 1.5C, are talks on remaining below this threshold are too little and too late.
-
A growth-driven approach to ending hunger
Can food systems transformation be viewed as industrial policy? Such an approach is not only more efficient and socially cohesive, but also more resilient to climate change, biodiversity loss, water scarcity and other planetary risks.
Increased value addition at the local level encourages the production and consumption of indigenous crops, reduces post-harvest losses, and improves dietary diversity and nutrition. This can be achieved in six steps.
-
Why national biodiversity plans must integrate agriculture
Biodiversity underpins agriculture, sustaining productivity, resilience, and long-term viability. It is not merely a component of agriculture but the very foundation, directly influencing the health and sustainability of cropping systems. For this reason, we should consider multispecies agricultural systems that harness the benefits of biodiversity to create healthier, more resilient agricultural landscapes.
-
Why using yield as a productivity indicator is counterproductive
Modern agricultural policies focus on increasing yields to boost food security. This emphasis on yield stems from the Green Revolution, which in the past, dramatically increased food production through the use of hybrid seeds, chemical fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation. While successful in addressing short-term hunger, this focus on maximizing output overlooks critical aspects of sustainability and resource efficiency.
-
Where ambition lies: Insights from the Africa Food Systems Forum 2024
With five thematic days, 100 panels, even more side events, deal rooms and TEDx talks, the African Food Systems Forum provided an important moment for the agri-food development community to reflect on a growing reality: the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will not be reached by 2030. SDG 2 on Zero Hunger is no exception. This article has also been republished in Farming First.
-
Understanding the CAADP Strategy and Action Plan for 2026-2035
In the last two decades, Africa has experienced significant economic and agricultural growth. The continent's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) doubled between 2000 and 2021, and its agricultural sector emerged as one of the fastest growing in the world. Yet, despite these advancements, challenges persist.
-
Estimating the cost to end hunger and malnutrition: has the research community failed policy makers?
How much would it cost to end hunger and malnutrition by 2030? Unfortunately, the research community does not provide a simple answer. We reviewed eight reports published between 2015-2024 and found that the cost estimates range from a total of USD 86 billion to USD 4 trillion.
-
Beyond SOFI 2024: Five innovative ideas to finance food security and nutrition
We welcome that SOFI 2024 re-opens the global debate on the fundamentals of financing food security and nutrition and echoes many of our recommendations from our enquiry on sustainable finance conducted with the GDPRD. However we can be even bolder.
This article has also been published in Farming First.
-
Modelling the additional investment needed to end hunger: Why are the cost estimates so wildly different?
A review of eight recent modelling reports of the additional investment needed for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2) by 2030 reveals a wide range of estimates; from a total of USD 86 billion to over USD 4 trillion. This results in confusion for governments, donors and policy makers.
-
Finding solutions to our food crises by addressing our blind spots
How can we describe the multi-dimensional food crises that we are currently facing? Some descriptions recognise its wide-ranging impact on areas such health, inequity, resilience and sustainability. However, another description is more applicable: blind spots.
-
Tracking G7 aid to food security and nutrition
The lack of a common framework for defining and tracking official development assistance (ODA) for food security and nutrition is a major obstacle to eliminating global hunger.
Different organizations, including donor countries, multilateral institutions, and research groups, all use their own definitions of ODA for food security and nutrition.
-
Building successful partnerships to end hunger
Food system transformation has taken centre stage on the global agenda. While we do not have a magic solution on how best to transform food systems, we know that it requires collective partnership across sectors. We have many independent initiatives underway but they need to be brought together around a common goal.
How do we build successful partnerships?
-
The Nairobi Action Plan: Advocacy priorities to promote competitive agrifood markets to boost food security
Tackling extreme concentration in agriculture inputs and food markets in Africa is critical for sustainable development.
A recent ICN Workshop addressed strategic advocacy priorities to help promote competition in agriculture and food markets. A consensus emerget hat combating food insecurity and persistent poverty begins with ensuring open and fair markets.
-
How continental competition policy strengthens the African marketplace
Leveraging regional African institutions and enforcement is a first step towards building a strong, continent-wide, competitive market. Better coordination and cooperation between regional competition authorities and national authorities is needed to help regulate cross-border anti-competitive behaviour and reinforce the capabilities of national authorities. This is of particular importance for countries that currently do not have competition laws or institutions in place.
-
Malawi and maize: prices have spiked on the back of bad weather and trade bans
Maize is the leading staple food in Malawi and crucial for food security. Typically, local production from smallholder farmers meets and exceeds annual requirements of around 3 million metric tonnes.
The country, however, is currently facing a crisis with 4.4 million Malawians (22% of the population) being food insecure.
This is due firstly to a poor harvest in 2023.
-
Aquaculture: a missed opportunity in the FAO global roadmap
Can extensive fish farming be an acceptable trade-off to meet the demand for animal proteins and still maintain healthy oceans and fresh waters, reduce the ingestion of toxic chemicals and antibiotics and improve rural livelihoods?
We welcome the inclusion of aquaculture in the FAO global roadmap on Achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) 2 without breaching the 1.5C threshold, published during CoP 28 in December 2023.
-
The Shamba Centre Co-founders reflect on the highlights from 2023
As 2023 comes to a close, Oshani Perera, Francine Picard and Carin Smaller reflect on what the Shamba Centre has done to create impact, and how it has influenced those with power to disrupt agriculture and food systems to end hunger sustainably.
These are their seven highlights from 2023.
-
The FAO Global Roadmap on SDG 2 and 1.5C: A fairytale far from the climate reality
The FAO has just released its much-anticipated global roadmap on Achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) 2 without breaching the 1.5C threshold. It is noble in its principles and its vision.
We are proud to partner with FAO on this roadmap through our joint project, Hesat2030: Ending hunger nutritiously, sustainably, and equitably. But we must also share our concerns as it stands now and improve its relevance to the current reality.
-
The CoP 28 decision: are we back to square one?
On 14 December 2023, the global climate talks at CoP 28 concluded with governments agreeing to transition away from fossil fuels. Many stakeholders have hailed this decision as a historic moment, that such a transition marks the beginning of the end of the hydrocarbon era.
We, at the Shamba Centre, are not so sure.
To transitioning away without prescribed targets and timelines to guide and track progress is of little value.
-
Opinion: Strengthen African market competition to fight food insecurity
The extreme levels of concentration in agricultural and food markets across Africa are a critically overlooked force driving up food insecurity and poverty. It harms small producers, informal enterprises, and consumers.
From seeds to supermarkets, markets present high barriers to entry, leading to frequent and harmful cartels. These cartels are widespread and cross-borders, as exemplified by the case of fertilizers, seeds, and poultry.
-
Donors must change how they measure funding for agriculture and food security and link to climate action
COP 28 has now recognised the role of agriculture in climate change.
However, research finds that more than 80% of aid to agriculture and food security screened had no climate mitigation objective, and over 60% had no climate adaptation objective. A new Agriculture and Food Security Aid Tracker can help bridge the gap.
-
Innovation in agri-food finance
The consultation draft of our enquiry with the GDPRD on sustainable finance is open for comment.
Unleashing the Catalytic Power of Donor Financing to Achieve SDG 2
The enquiry explored how donors can be bolder with their financing to increase development impacts while crowding-in development finance institutions and private investors.
The findings break new ground on financing the missing middle (SMEs seeking financing between USD 50,000 and USD 2 million), blended financing and on increasing financing from development finance institutions and domestic lenders alike.
-
From zero hunger to sustainable food systems transformation: What does it mean and how do we get there?
It is time for a radical rethink on how to eradicate poverty and hunger without destroying the planet, our health, and social cohesion.
We need to transform the current agricultural and food system. But this transformation must be more just, more equitable and give greater attention to the specific situations in each country and region. It will also require more sacrifices from those who have most benefitted in the past. This transformation will not be easily achieved given the complex environmental, geo-political and epidemiological constraints.
-
735 million people still hungry, but new evidence shows urbanisation is the next food battle
Hunger levels have not recovered from the global pandemic, three La Nina in a row and the Ukraine war. According to the latest UN report on the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World, there are a total of 735 million people hungry, and 122 million more than before these events.
While the report warns that shocks like these are now the new norm, it is structural drivers like the rapid pace of urbanisation that that will drive the most significant changes in how we produce and consume food.
-
Realizing the potential of neglected crops in Latin America
Recent crisis-driven increases in food and nutrition insecurity, coupled with the growing threat of climate change, have highlighted the need for drastic changes in our food systems.
In this context, expanding the cultivation and consumption of neglected crops presents a valuable opportunity to improve livelihoods and nutrition and reduce environmental impacts of food production—if sufficient resources can be invested into research and development.
-
Bringing back neglected crops: A food and climate solution for Africa
As the food and climate crises continue to cause suffering around the world, one under-appreciated solution—neglected crops—could be a powerful tool to alleviate both crises in one of the worst affected regions: Africa.
Bringing back neglected crops is not a new topic, but the idea has gathered new momentum in 2023, which the United Nations has declared the International Year of Millets.
-
An open letter to the Financial Times: Unpacking the debt-swap for the Galápagos Islands
The Shamba Centre’s Co-founder and Director of Programmes, Oshani Perera, responds to an article in the Financial Times about the recent experiment in Ecuador to swap debt against the caretaking of the Galápagos Islands.
She provides insight on what is needed for such debt for nature swaps to succeed and what needs to be avoided to avert potential failure.
-
Six lessons learned from a year of multiple crises
Experts examine the global policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war regarding food, fuel, and fertilizer as well as the conflict’s global market disruptions and its particular impacts on African economies.
Six key lessons emerge that apply broadly to addressing the impacts of these overlapping crises going forward, building resilience in agrifood systems, and improving global food security in the face of future shocks.
-
Thoughts from the Extinction or Regeneration conference
A two-part series in which the Shamba Centre Co-founder and Director of Programmes, Oshani Perera, shares her learnings and insights following her participation in the Extinction or Regeneration conference in London.
-
How can donors make their funding on sustainable food systems more catalytic?
This is the million-dollar question that the Global Donor Platform on Rural Development (GDPRD) seeks to answer through its timely stakeholder consultation on sustainable finance.
The Shamba Centre for Food & Climate, which is designing and leading the consultation, is ready for the challenge.
-
Can donors disrupt the food system?
It is possible to eradicate hunger, malnutrition, poverty, and heavily polluting agricultural practices in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Nigeria by 2030.
A series of recent reports published by IFPRI and IISD that Carin Smaller, Francine Picard and Mali Eber Rose co-authored highlight that a food system transformation in these three countries can be achieved by increasing public investment by an average of USD 10 billion per year between 2023 and 2030, and by implementing more effective interventions.
-
Is market concentration killing salmons?
"Salmon deaths on fish farms in Scotland nearly doubled last year, official figures show, owing to growing levels of disease, parasites and jellyfish blooms”. About one in four salmon in sea cages are dying in Scotland.
Salmon production has been on the rise in the past decade, but the top 3 salmon producers – Norway, Chile and Scotland – are now seeing their industries at danger of collapse: the salmon population is dying at historical levels.
-
The Chilean salmon: concentrated power with disastrous impact
Chile has seen significant growth in its salmon industry, which contributes greatly to regional employment and provides employment opportunities for a considerable number of women and young people.
Despite this success, the Chilean salmon industry faces a number of issues that need to be addressed.